Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 9 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0159 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.00287 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | AdamW |
item_bias | Categorical | Uniform | True, False | True |
FlexMF WARP
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in implicit-feedback mode with WARP loss.
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 9, 'regularization': 0.015922899971229115, 'learning_rate': 0.0028666698840842833, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': True, 'epochs': 18 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.16809865233240098, 'LogRBP': 2.011035714113172, 'NDCG': 0.4158398961397396, 'RecipRank': 0.32732768642869414, 'TrainTask': '03843709-a01b-4955-b95a-ae5a254a8b3c', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': False, 'training_iteration': 18, 'trial_id': '69a32768', 'date': '2025-05-07_10-19-31', 'timestamp': 1746627571, 'time_this_iter_s': 70.88943409919739, 'time_total_s': 1716.4671351909637, 'pid': 284894, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 9, 'regularization': 0.015922899971229115, 'learning_rate': 0.0028666698840842833, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': True, 'epochs': 18 }, 'time_since_restore': 155.94253373146057, 'iterations_since_restore': 2 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?