Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 5 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0247 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.00139 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | AdamW |
FlexMF Explicit
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 5, 'regularization': 0.024668070152210706, 'learning_rate': 0.0013901087865598942, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'epochs': 6 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.09163965834018835, 'LogRBP': 1.404348820085433, 'NDCG': 0.3269639768819648, 'RecipRank': 0.2213617473772073, 'RMSE': 0.8222847780739189, 'TrainTask': 'd2e2db70-c748-4efa-ab7f-affc65c04192', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': True, 'training_iteration': 6, 'trial_id': '02df4d0d', 'date': '2025-05-06_22-13-31', 'timestamp': 1746584011, 'time_this_iter_s': 44.46161413192749, 'time_total_s': 291.95735359191895, 'pid': 35694, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 5, 'regularization': 0.024668070152210706, 'learning_rate': 0.0013901087865598942, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'epochs': 6 }, 'time_since_restore': 44.46161413192749, 'iterations_since_restore': 1 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?