This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
/home/mde48/lenskit/lenskit-codex/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/ray/tune/search/sample.py:700: RayDeprecationWarning: The `base` argument is deprecated. Please remove it as it is not actually needed in this method.
embedding_size |
Integer |
LogUniform |
4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 |
7 |
regularization |
Float |
LogUniform |
0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 |
0.0684 |
learning_rate |
Float |
LogUniform |
0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 |
0.0138 |
reg_method |
Categorical |
Uniform |
L2, AdamW |
L2 |
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{
'embedding_size': 7,
'regularization': 0.06838895250370292,
'learning_rate': 0.013750991205410215,
'reg_method': 'L2',
'epochs': 9
}
With these metrics:
{
'RBP': 0.00796778659473439,
'LogRBP': -1.0381085720761023,
'NDCG': 0.1686059025449284,
'RecipRank': 0.03311863852055791,
'RMSE': 0.821408136161846,
'TrainTask': 'c761cfea-e65d-453d-8674-58b9d079a975',
'TrainTime': None,
'TrainCPU': None,
'max_epochs': 50,
'done': True,
'training_iteration': 9,
'trial_id': '7bee5d84',
'date': '2025-05-04_21-17-13',
'timestamp': 1746407833,
'time_this_iter_s': 2.425473690032959,
'time_total_s': 22.48616647720337,
'pid': 2508578,
'hostname': 'CCI-ws21',
'node_ip': '10.248.127.152',
'config': {
'embedding_size': 7,
'regularization': 0.06838895250370292,
'learning_rate': 0.013750991205410215,
'reg_method': 'L2',
'epochs': 9
},
'time_since_restore': 2.425473690032959,
'iterations_since_restore': 1
}
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?