Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values |
---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW |
FlexMF Explicit on ML1M
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 8, 'regularization': 0.04348568763678297, 'learning_rate': 0.007860577021310463, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 7 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.0159899526060798, 'NDCG': 0.1816292386546767, 'RecipRank': 0.06256693398264787, 'RMSE': 0.8224932070056729, 'TrainTask': 'caf514e0-bac0-486a-a261-fe588be878c4', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': False, 'training_iteration': 7, 'trial_id': 'cdb8e_00091', 'date': '2025-04-03_22-16-25', 'timestamp': 1743732985, 'time_this_iter_s': 2.600450277328491, 'time_total_s': 17.758015394210815, 'pid': 1297952, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 8, 'regularization': 0.04348568763678297, 'learning_rate': 0.007860577021310463, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 7 }, 'time_since_restore': 17.758015394210815, 'iterations_since_restore': 7 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?