Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size_exp | Integer | Uniform | 3 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 3 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0792 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.00701 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | AdamW |
FlexMF Explicit
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size_exp': 3, 'regularization': 0.07920205769115246, 'learning_rate': 0.00701067351316588, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'epochs': 7 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.019037303703845935, 'DCG': 0.6707836823820809, 'NDCG': 0.18833740275810948, 'RecipRank': 0.07989762170334741, 'Hit10': 0.16887417218543047, 'RMSE': 0.8201711773872375, 'max_epochs': 50, 'epoch_train_s': 0.06732641509734094, 'epoch_measure_s': 2.449305384187028, 'done': False, 'training_iteration': 7, 'trial_id': 'fae4e54b', 'date': '2025-09-30_15-26-55', 'timestamp': 1759260415, 'time_this_iter_s': 2.520402431488037, 'time_total_s': 18.560733795166016, 'pid': 301878, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size_exp': 3, 'regularization': 0.07920205769115246, 'learning_rate': 0.00701067351316588, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'epochs': 7 }, 'time_since_restore': 18.560733795166016, 'iterations_since_restore': 7 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?