Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 7 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0684 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.0138 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | L2 |
FlexMF Explicit
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 7, 'regularization': 0.06838895250370292, 'learning_rate': 0.013750991205410215, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 9 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.00796778659473439, 'LogRBP': -1.0381085720761023, 'NDCG': 0.1686059025449284, 'RecipRank': 0.03311863852055791, 'RMSE': 0.821408136161846, 'TrainTask': 'c761cfea-e65d-453d-8674-58b9d079a975', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': True, 'training_iteration': 9, 'trial_id': '7bee5d84', 'date': '2025-05-04_21-17-13', 'timestamp': 1746407833, 'time_this_iter_s': 2.425473690032959, 'time_total_s': 22.48616647720337, 'pid': 2508578, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 7, 'regularization': 0.06838895250370292, 'learning_rate': 0.013750991205410215, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 9 }, 'time_since_restore': 2.425473690032959, 'iterations_since_restore': 1 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?