Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 275 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.5 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.00118 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | AdamW |
FlexMF Explicit
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 275, 'regularization': 0.5000854696340721, 'learning_rate': 0.0011840985940235055, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'epochs': 6 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.1836954179833178, 'LogRBP': 2.099763739767223, 'NDCG': 0.4290506910824616, 'RecipRank': 0.3870147262075251, 'RMSE': 0.7579250491011952, 'TrainTask': '8c72cdb8-85c9-4569-9823-9dcfdfcc2359', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': False, 'training_iteration': 6, 'trial_id': 'f60bccb5', 'date': '2025-05-04_22-22-46', 'timestamp': 1746411766, 'time_this_iter_s': 10.91522216796875, 'time_total_s': 69.17381834983826, 'pid': 2595285, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 275, 'regularization': 0.5000854696340721, 'learning_rate': 0.0011840985940235055, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'epochs': 6 }, 'time_since_restore': 69.17381834983826, 'iterations_since_restore': 6 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?