Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 14 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0498 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.0025 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | L2 |
FlexMF Explicit
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 14, 'regularization': 0.04977041557904842, 'learning_rate': 0.002501599473184507, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 7 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.1201926373103401, 'LogRBP': 1.675580457356915, 'NDCG': 0.4037863375695813, 'RecipRank': 0.2678976522436296, 'RMSE': 0.7612197947196359, 'TrainTask': '70766d29-5efa-4d7e-b26e-29020730645f', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': True, 'training_iteration': 7, 'trial_id': 'b668a_00065', 'date': '2025-05-05_12-16-44', 'timestamp': 1746461804, 'time_this_iter_s': 9.56740665435791, 'time_total_s': 60.67594361305237, 'pid': 11399, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 14, 'regularization': 0.04977041557904842, 'learning_rate': 0.002501599473184507, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 7 }, 'time_since_restore': 60.67594361305237, 'iterations_since_restore': 7 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?