Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 11 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0261 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.00432 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | AdamW |
item_bias | Categorical | Uniform | True, False | True |
FlexMF WARP
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in implicit-feedback mode with WARP loss.
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 11, 'regularization': 0.02611204259178589, 'learning_rate': 0.004324233433363248, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': True, 'epochs': 19 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.23953815395638473, 'LogRBP': 2.3651974016598736, 'NDCG': 0.47787040569761824, 'RecipRank': 0.42361825741209475, 'TrainTask': '5bcdb62b-9826-485a-b7c0-8cf6238be46c', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': True, 'training_iteration': 19, 'trial_id': 'aee8a57f', 'date': '2025-05-05_09-03-10', 'timestamp': 1746450190, 'time_this_iter_s': 14.637391567230225, 'time_total_s': 462.90496826171875, 'pid': 3943279, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 11, 'regularization': 0.02611204259178589, 'learning_rate': 0.004324233433363248, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': True, 'epochs': 19 }, 'time_since_restore': 86.4799211025238, 'iterations_since_restore': 4 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?