Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 24 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0174 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.00635 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | AdamW |
item_bias | Categorical | Uniform | True, False | True |
FlexMF WARP
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in implicit-feedback mode with WARP loss.
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 24, 'regularization': 0.01743226405485094, 'learning_rate': 0.006352784697660642, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': True, 'epochs': 9 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.19015425062079377, 'LogRBP': 2.1343202789545064, 'NDCG': 0.43780242876109193, 'RecipRank': 0.37138329866684155, 'TrainTask': '27fe16f1-91fb-4293-9590-b24a8198abb5', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': False, 'training_iteration': 9, 'trial_id': 'f66f5633', 'date': '2025-05-05_19-11-42', 'timestamp': 1746486702, 'time_this_iter_s': 60.38285946846008, 'time_total_s': 522.8673887252808, 'pid': 321186, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 24, 'regularization': 0.01743226405485094, 'learning_rate': 0.006352784697660642, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': True, 'epochs': 9 }, 'time_since_restore': 522.8673887252808, 'iterations_since_restore': 9 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?