Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size_exp | Integer | Uniform | 3 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 4 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.117 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.0318 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | AdamW |
item_bias | Categorical | Uniform | True, False | False |
FlexMF WARP
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in implicit-feedback mode with WARP loss.
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size_exp': 4, 'regularization': 0.11661573270761147, 'learning_rate': 0.03181517913263124, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': False, 'epochs': 11 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.08246482905700545, 'DCG': 1.1407944788122368, 'NDCG': 0.3203033628625242, 'RecipRank': 0.290380303426754, 'Hit10': 0.5612582781456954, 'max_epochs': 50, 'epoch_train_s': 1.9850644499529153, 'epoch_measure_s': 2.0529073840007186, 'done': False, 'training_iteration': 11, 'trial_id': '9119d039', 'date': '2025-09-30_12-55-40', 'timestamp': 1759251340, 'time_this_iter_s': 4.041879177093506, 'time_total_s': 42.763832092285156, 'pid': 4131656, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size_exp': 4, 'regularization': 0.11661573270761147, 'learning_rate': 0.03181517913263124, 'reg_method': 'AdamW', 'item_bias': False, 'epochs': 11 }, 'time_since_restore': 42.763832092285156, 'iterations_since_restore': 11 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?