Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 219 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.085 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.00109 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | L2 |
FlexMF Explicit
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 219, 'regularization': 0.08496870229405735, 'learning_rate': 0.001090068401204834, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 7 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.12222645114964603, 'NDCG': 0.37846845679985575, 'RecipRank': 0.27772795591921196, 'RMSE': 0.7775135770440101, 'TrainTask': '6273e4e2-f6ea-44e3-a6c8-e827e15737f0', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': True, 'training_iteration': 7, 'trial_id': 'b49cc5c4', 'date': '2025-05-02_11-02-45', 'timestamp': 1746198165, 'time_this_iter_s': 17.094162940979004, 'time_total_s': 121.62569880485535, 'pid': 734263, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 219, 'regularization': 0.08496870229405735, 'learning_rate': 0.001090068401204834, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 7 }, 'time_since_restore': 121.62569880485535, 'iterations_since_restore': 7 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?