Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 14 |
regularization | Float | LogUniform | 0.0001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 | 0.0498 |
learning_rate | Float | LogUniform | 0.001 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 0.1 | 0.0025 |
reg_method | Categorical | Uniform | L2, AdamW | L2 |
FlexMF Explicit
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the FlexMF scorer in explicit-feedback mode (a biased matrix factorization model trained with PyTorch).
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 14, 'regularization': 0.04977041557904842, 'learning_rate': 0.002501599473184507, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 6 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.11807363051215715, 'NDCG': 0.37717426296763396, 'RecipRank': 0.2592344438170556, 'RMSE': 0.7829963558088198, 'TrainTask': 'ed8b825b-c5b4-4ace-b605-1924db72f19f', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 50, 'done': True, 'training_iteration': 6, 'trial_id': '921a5_00065', 'date': '2025-04-22_15-52-28', 'timestamp': 1745351548, 'time_this_iter_s': 16.80943536758423, 'time_total_s': 102.95551085472107, 'pid': 949868, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 14, 'regularization': 0.04977041557904842, 'learning_rate': 0.002501599473184507, 'reg_method': 'L2', 'epochs': 6 }, 'time_since_restore': 102.95551085472107, 'iterations_since_restore': 6 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?