Parameter | Type | Distribution | Values | Selected |
---|---|---|---|---|
embedding_size | Integer | LogUniform | 4 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 512 | 327 |
regularization.user | Float | LogUniform | 1e-05 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 1 | 0.65 |
regularization.item | Float | LogUniform | 1e-05 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 1 | 0.00269 |
damping.user | Float | LogUniform | 1e-12 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 100 | 66.9 |
damping.item | Float | LogUniform | 1e-12 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 100 | 1.75e-10 |
ALS BiasedMF
This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for biased matrix factorization with ALS.
Parameter Search Space
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{ 'embedding_size': 327, 'regularization': {'user': 0.649746030842825, 'item': 0.002690798332663406}, 'damping': {'user': 66.89592055271686, 'item': 1.746296335934768e-10}, 'epochs': 6 }
With these metrics:
{ 'RBP': 0.05363133913048115, 'NDCG': 0.3568942374137382, 'RecipRank': 0.09746205750688007, 'RMSE': 0.7654107316018957, 'TrainTask': '8978a200-058c-4186-bc9f-b9dcc620926e', 'TrainTime': None, 'TrainCPU': None, 'max_epochs': 30, 'done': True, 'training_iteration': 6, 'trial_id': 'a81e89dc', 'date': '2025-04-30_23-49-53', 'timestamp': 1746071393, 'time_this_iter_s': 100.89020133018494, 'time_total_s': 690.7189295291901, 'pid': 400825, 'hostname': 'CCI-ws21', 'node_ip': '10.248.127.152', 'config': { 'embedding_size': 327, 'regularization': {'user': 0.649746030842825, 'item': 0.002690798332663406}, 'damping': {'user': 66.89592055271686, 'item': 1.746296335934768e-10}, 'epochs': 6 }, 'time_since_restore': 690.7189295291901, 'iterations_since_restore': 6 }
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Learning Parameters
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?