This page analyzes the hyperparameter tuning results for the implicit-feedback ALS matrix factorization model.
Parameter Search Space
<frozen abc>:106: UserWarning: component class Placeholder does not define a config attribute type
embedding_size_exp |
Integer |
Uniform |
3 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 10 |
4 |
regularization.user |
Float |
LogUniform |
1e-05 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 1 |
0.00866 |
regularization.item |
Float |
LogUniform |
1e-05 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 1 |
8.46e-05 |
weight |
Float |
Uniform |
5 ≤ \(x\) ≤ 100 |
6.06 |
Final Result
Searching selected the following configuration:
{
'embedding_size_exp': 4,
'regularization': {'user': 0.008655513740073196, 'item': 8.45776550979749e-05},
'weight': 6.059395797720178,
'epochs': 5
}
With these metrics:
{
'RBP': 0.21296189932217136,
'DCG': 11.578181244976797,
'NDCG': 0.4704901381918856,
'RecipRank': 0.380232100012578,
'Hit10': 0.6314229249011858,
'max_epochs': 30,
'epoch_train_s': 0.0938908769749105,
'epoch_measure_s': 3.592203930951655,
'done': False,
'training_iteration': 5,
'trial_id': 'b492fffe',
'date': '2025-09-29_13-18-13',
'timestamp': 1759166293,
'time_this_iter_s': 3.6897239685058594,
'time_total_s': 18.73239779472351,
'pid': 3385876,
'hostname': 'CCI-ws21',
'node_ip': '10.248.127.152',
'config': {
'embedding_size_exp': 4,
'regularization': {'user': 0.008655513740073196, 'item': 8.45776550979749e-05},
'weight': 6.059395797720178,
'epochs': 5
},
'time_since_restore': 18.73239779472351,
'iterations_since_restore': 5
}
Parameter Analysis
Embedding Size
The embedding size is the hyperparameter that most affects the model’s fundamental logic, so let’s look at performance as a fufnction of it:
Iteration Completion
How many iterations, on average, did we complete?
How did the metric progress in the best result?
How did the metric progress in the longest results?